Відео

Quite a few comments like "the problem is again, that the real world hits us" - interesting.....

Bob is a great speaker but say the Clean Code book has awful code that goes against his own advice! the functions in that book make unexpected changes to external variables ALL the time. Instead of passing a value to change and returning an output. Functions must be ran in a specific order and depend on unknown variables 😢 He writes a silly amount of functions. To achieve 2 lines of code like adding two files he will write at least functions, half of them oneLine wrapper functions that just call another one line function Read ”It's probably time to stop recommending Clean Code” or watch the primagen’s video reading it

Nice opening. Always love outright and open honesty.

This was extremely interesting and entertaining

Insightful, just met what I searched alot for

Video from 2017 relevant in 2024 and beyond also.

JetBrains IDE is basically VS.Code if VS.Code's developers were 6-12 months behind on their backlog.

That is similar to how "healthy nutrition", has become a debate about how many glasses of water and how many grams of vegetables one has to eat every day. Regarding of water intake, i recently heard a scientist who essentially said: it depends on the person. There is no right amount of glasses of water. Healthy nutrition is about being mindful with reagard to your eating habits. Its about finding what works for you. Not about numbers and applying a behavioural pattern. But humans like thinking in patterns, because it is easy for the brain. Thinking is hard. Applying patterns is easy.

@46:48 "javascript + is the same as Math.abs" ... is absolute complete bunk you should correct for your next talk.

This is absolutely very insightful presentation on the actual working of containers.

At 24 minutes, I finally understand function programming and also why it's a huge lie. You are just moving conditional processes outside of the functions to the callers, which does absolutely noting to make programming better, more, safe, etc,ect. I do at least understand that it sets yourself up for easier parallelism in hardware. The question is, if it's harder to write functional, isn't that the thing that leads to more bugs? Ymmv

Perfect. Instantly want to work for you and your team also as I would learn so much (very quickly)

Host's PPT slides were so vividly to illustrate the concept of Flink and its application. Its Awesome !

He's a lot more likable than I expected

I love this guy. The way he talks is significantly different to other people when they talk about scrum

Good presentation.

this is an amazing talk, good job!

IMHO.., "CUPID" is not something used to superseed "SOLID". I believe both "CUPID" and "SOLID" are complementing each other. They have some interconnection in between.

I’m terribly sorry. What is this about? Confusion between agile and Agile, scrum and/or other methodologies? Not again.

The Java comparison of the json parsing hurts me. That answer class should just have public fields. Absolutely no reason to encapsulate the fields when the getters and setters do nothing but directly set/return the field.

Really glad this talk came across my home page. Best talk on identity I've come across so far.

This is a great talk and it would have deserved significantly better Audio quality.

I am a subset of Everybody and I love agile so much that I'd have signed that manifesto too if they'd have asked me. Scrum, on the other hand, I think Bart Simpson summed up Scrum quite adequately when he said "Eat my shorts".

Not agile, just scrum

Pure advertisement.

Structured Analysis and Design are the Best way, Not Agile

Does every talk have to be bait? Its exhausting.

We just call it JWST during Pride Month, who knows how much progress that homophobe stamped out.

Wow. This was easily the BEST technical presentation I’ve ever seen. Each topic was concise with a live demo to illustrate. He really showed off the power of Elixir and BEAM. I just ordered his 3rd edition of Elixir in Action book! If he can write like he presents, I’m in for a treat! As another commenter said, this was a masterclass in tech talks. Loved it!

are flip charts composable? 😂

Excellent examples of how you can put leadership buzzwords into concrete actions!

A fantastic talk, and it's not even his first language!?

That's a beautiful brilliant idea and product. I still have painful memory of the cognitive overload trying to understand the BASIC code examples given in a book alongside ZX Spectrum PC way back in my childhood! Long story short, I couldn't and it still hurts me to think about all the fun i missed. With Hedy, it should be really practical to grasp programming concepts progressively for lil children.

pseudo russian is so fucking OP lmao

11:11 and the Commodore 65 methinks

6:21 wait wait wait handbrake.. What if the line starts on the right 😜BUGGER ! the end of the line is the left and I just tricked myself with data, again, as we do🤣 Information ? no no sir. That doesn't have a physical form. We should read that word as "structured data" "HOW STRUCTURED MATE ?"

3:07 (IYKYK) Is that a PUTTER in your sentence or are you just driving today I'm sorry sir, the actual joke is that golf is a driver, a hole, and le flag

I honestly reference this talk every job I've gone to. And has been a key voice in shaping my own approach to software. Love the humour and the pragmatism

Excellent talk, thoughtful, inspiring stuff! A refreshing take on IaC data engineering and architecture for the mid-2020s!

there is some truth to what he's saying, BUT it's demonstrably incorrect too. if what he's saying were true, SCRUM would have never gotten big in the first place. it was _not_ the original thing we used. i was there when it was new - and it was, well, new 😀so the fact it got adopted (over time) disproves the theory that the industry clings to old ideas and never lets go. if the idea is strong the industry will adopt it. yes, there is inertia, but if there are compelling reasons for the switch it'll switch. same with "new languages" - i was there when C/C++ was all there was. and then the industry switched to java/C#. recently (or relatively recently) it switched to js and python. so. the reason why the industry hasn't switched to whatever you think is "better" - not just processes, this applies to programming languages, technologies, development methodologies, whatever, you name it - so the reason it hasn't been adopted most likely is "because the arguments aren't compelling enough (or possibly inertia, but probably not)".

Separation on single responsibility is also to read the code better and leave room for different implementations (?) 🤔

As always, watch Ward Cunningham's short video "Debt Metaphor" and listen carefully how he differentiate between "bad code" and technical debt. Most developers mean "bad code" when they say technical debt. When they say refactoring, they mean "two weeks rewrite that may cause more bugs" (which project managers have learned the hard way). Then us XP people comes along and say "refactor mercilessly" and the project manager has a heart attack and sends us to Antarctica.

CHAOS data look like that because.... .... software cannot solve a social problem. Solve social problems, software will work.

That thing about Open Source is true. OSS: - is the only way for the highest quality - offers highest security - offers highest privacy - is transparent - you can adjust it to your needs - is the only one able to just do what you need Modular cars with OSS like license will be most env firendly: - open license will allow anyone to manufacture them and all the modules anywhere, and it will boost many economies - modularity will allow poor people to have them, become wealthier, and buy more efficient modules later - production near the client - service possible by every workshop - paid modules for high quality options - longer life - less resources wasted - Cwelon Susk's head will explode. AI tools will not write software. We will get rid off all the programming languages we have today. AI tools will translate the form easy for us to grasp into a highly optimal machine code. It will be also easier for us to maintain it.

I admire the speaker for taking care of many questions during the presentation and keeping focused.

Haters gonna hate, right? It's a shame you're not mentioning cardano at all in this talk. Usin Cardano as a blockchain one can do half o this talk already.

such an incredible talk

Sure. The knowledge from drones will be more important than the crops. Of course, when we feel hungry we can just "eat knowledge" .

The reason AI can complete some code so well, is because it has seen similar patterns before many times - that says more about the failure of software development languages to evolve to a more declarative state in the past 50 years than it says about the future of development. If languages had not stagnated so badly, we wouldn't need AI.

1:54 that’s an interesting definition… not everyone can afford to do the right or best option up front, so must opt for a cheaper faster solution. Like buying a house… I want a mansion, but I can’t afford the debt…. Hmmm maybe there are two types of debt… debt is also making a solution too big for the current constraints and requirements. The other kind of debt is an aging house that I must either maintain and repair, sell, or bulldoze.